Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick R. Coudert et al., as Surviving Trustee, etc., v. Blanche Hauel de Logerot et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick R. Coudert et al., as Surviving Trustee, etc., v. Blanche Hauel de Logerot et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
143 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick R. Coudert et al., as Surviving Trustee, etc., v. Blanche Hauel de Logerot et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Submitted June 18, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made at the April term, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by the appellants for a re-sale under a judgment of foreclosure.
Albert SUeTmey and Samuel ET. Ordwan/ for appellants.
John M. Bowers and James W. Gerard, Jr., for the New York Realty Company, respondent.
Lawson Lehmam and Theodore Banomeist&r for Henry Morgenthau et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.