General
Charles A. Clegg, Respondent, v. The New York Newspaper Union et al., Appellants
129 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles A. Clegg, Respondent, v. The New York Newspaper Union et al., Appellants.
(Argued November 30, 1891;
decided December 15, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General. Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 14, 1891, which reversed an order of Special Term, denying a motion by plaintiff for a new trial and a motion by defendant for a reargument.
Horace Russell for appellants.
William B. Hornblower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order as to all the defendants, except Bealls, Foster and Rowell, and as to them order reversed; no opinion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.