Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida, 1967 — 389 U.S. 857 · caselaw · US
General
Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida
389 U.S. 857·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 347.
No. 371.
Roberts v. Florida; and Nash v. Florida.
Stmley Jay Bartel for petitioner in No. 347.
Milton E. Grusmark for petitioner in No. 371.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied without prejudice to applications for writs of habeas corpus in the appropriate United States District Courts.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in No. 347.
Reported below: No. 347, 188 So. 2d 392; No. 371, 188 So. 2d 391.