Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Smith, Judge, et al. v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. et al., 1979 — 440 U.S. 933 · caselaw · US
General
Smith, Judge, et al. v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. et al.
440 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-482.
Smith, Judge, et al. v. Daily Mail Publishing Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. App. W. Ya. [Certiorari granted, 439 U. S. 963.] Motions of American Society of Newspaper Editors et al., American Newspaper Publishers Assn., Chicago Tribune Co., and American Civil Liberties Union for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.