General
IRVING NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas M. BLAKE and Langdon P. Marvin, as Receivers, etc., Defendants in Error
298 F. 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
IRVING NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas M. BLAKE and Langdon P. Marvin, as Receivers, etc., Defendants in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 5, 1924.)
No. 360.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Olcott, Bonynge, McManus & Ernst, of New York City (Irving L. Ernst and Joseph Glass, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Parker & Aaron, of New York City (Herman Aaron, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.