Contracts · MBE-tested
In re James Luther STROUD v. STATE of Alabama. Ex Parte James Luther Stroud
295 Ala. 424325 So. 2d 204·Alabama Supreme Court·1976·AL
HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, MADDOX and SHORES, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
325 So.2d 204
In re James Luther STROUD v. STATE of Alabama. Ex Parte James Luther Stroud.
SC 1402.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Jan. 2, 1976.
Ian F. Gaston, Mobile, for petitioner.
William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, opposed.
[MAJORITY — JONES, Justice.]
JONES, Justice.
On preliminary examination, the petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals, 56 Ala.App. 692, 325 So.2d 200, was granted. Upon further consideration, we hold that the writ was improvidently granted and is due to be quashed notwithstanding the able argument of petitioner’s counsel who did not represent him at nisi prius.
Writ of certiorari quashed.
HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, MADDOX and SHORES, JJ., concur.