Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. et al., 1967 — 387 U.S. 238 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. et al.
387 U.S. 238·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. et al.
No. 1017.
Decided May 22, 1967.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Nathan Lewin, Howard E. Shapiro and Herbert G. Schoepke for the United States.
Maxwell H. Herriott and Louis Quarles for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Section 1.1 (e) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, 80 Stat. 241; United States v. First City National Bank of Houston, 386 U. S. 361.