Corporations
Griffin Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Gold Dust Corporation and Two in One Shinola Bixby Corporation, Appellants, and Raymond Warburton, Defendant
246 A.D. 610·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Griffin Manufacturing Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Gold Dust Corporation and Two in One Shinola Bixby Corporation, Appellants, and Raymond Warburton, Defendant.
(Appeal No. 1.)
[MAJORITY]
Order denying motion of corporate defendants for a bill of particulars affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to renew the motion, if so advised, on completion of the examination of defendants as allowed in the companion appeal [Griffin Mfg. Co., Inc., v. Gold Dust Corp. (No. 2), 245 App. Div. 385], decided herewith. If such examination is had and completed under the conditions allowed, it is likely that no bill of particulars will be necessary. Lazansky, P. J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.