Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Canadian Agricultural Coal and Colonization Company (Limited), Respondent, v. Joseph L. Spofford, Appellant, 1895 — 145 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
The Canadian Agricultural Coal and Colonization Company (Limited), Respondent, v. Joseph L. Spofford, Appellant
145 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Canadian Agricultural Coal and Colonization Company (Limited), Respondent, v. Joseph L. Spofford, Appellant.
(Argued February 25, 1895;
decided March 12, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 14, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing defendant to furnish a bill of particulars.
Henry W. Hardon for appellant.
Edwin T. Rice, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.