Contracts · MBE-tested
Ghirwar Singh et al., Respondents, v. Lilian Velez, Appellant
301 A.D.2d 516753 N.Y.S.2d 385·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2003·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ghirwar Singh et al., Respondents, v Lilian Velez, Appellant.
[753 NYS2d 385]
[MAJORITY]
—In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a real estate contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated September 5, 2001, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the particular facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly determined that material issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of the defendant’s summary judgment motion (see CPLR 3212 [b]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.