Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
T. Ellett Hodgskin, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Appellants, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
T. Ellett Hodgskin, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Appellants
168 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
T. Ellett Hodgskin, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of The Rogers Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Charles E. Pell et al., Appellants.
Bogers v. Pell, 47 App. Div. 240, affirmed.
(Argued June 10, 1901;
decided July 10, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 13, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a .pry-
Henry G. Atwater, Thaddeson D. Henneson and And/rew Shiland for appellants.
John Larkin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Landon and Cullen., JJ.