Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Bowman, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Elmira, Appellant. Caroline Beamer, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant, 1873 — 53 N.Y. 634 · caselaw · US
General
David Bowman, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Elmira, Appellant. Caroline Beamer, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant
53 N.Y. 634·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Bowman, Respondent, v. The First National Bank of Elmira, Appellant. Caroline Beamer, Respondent, v. The Same, Appellant.
These cases present the same questions, and were submitted and decided with Golema/n, v. First Nat. Ba/nk (ante, p. 388).
Murdock & Stevens for the appellant.
E. H. Benn for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed.