Tax
CITY OF SEATTLE et al. v. BEEZER et al.
376 U.S. 224·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CITY OF SEATTLE et al. v. BEEZER et al.
No. 677.
Decided March 2, 1964.
A. L. Newbould, Richard S. White, William A. Helsell, Robert L. McCarty and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. for appellants.
Alfred J. Schweppe for Beezer, and Clarence C. Dill, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for Public Utility-District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington, appellees.
Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and David J. Bardin for the Federal Power Commission, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U. S. 320.