Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission et al., 1948 — 333 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission et al.
333 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 533.
Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission et al.
A. L. Wirin, Dean Acheson, Charles A. Horsky, Saburo Kido and Fred Okrand for petitioner.
Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, for respondents. Briefs of amici curiae in support of the petition were filed by Attorney General Clark and Solicitor General Perlman for the United States; Lee Pressman and Frank Donner for the Congress of Industrial Organizations; and Thur-good Marshall and Marian Wynn Perry for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of California. Certiorari granted.