General
Sadie A. Stead, Executrix, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Isabella M. Curtis et al.
239 U.S. 634·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 132.
Sadie A. Stead, Executrix, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Isabella M. Curtis et al.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Argued December 10 and 13, 1915.
Decided December 20, 1915.
Mr. Horace W. Philbrook for the appellants.
Mr. Garret W. Mc-Enerney, Mr. John S. Partridge and Mr. C. H. Lovell for the appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Cosmopolitan Mining Co. v. Walsh, 193 U. S. 460; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 235-236; (2) Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Merriam Co. v. Syndicate Publishing Co., 237 U. S. 618, 621.