General
CHANDLER v. STATE
27 Ala. App. 491175 So. 326·Alabama Court of Appeals·1937·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
175 So. 326
CHANDLER v. STATE.
8 Div. 396.
Court of Appeals of Alabama,
June 8, 1937.
Henry D. Jones, of Florence, for appellant.
A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
[MAJORITY — SAMFORD, Judge.]
SAMFORD, Judge.
As is required by the statute, we have examined this entire record, and in it we find no questions of merit raised by any of the objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence.
The evidence was in conflict; that for the state being sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Applying Supreme Court Rule ,45, the judgment in this cáse is affirmed.
Affirmed.