Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc., 1947 — 332 U.S. 761 · caselaw · US
General
Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.
332 U.S. 761·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 142.
Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc.
Raphael H. Weissman for petitioner.
Joseph B. Cavallaro for respondent.
Martin A. Schenck, Harold C. McCollom and Kenneth W. Greenawalt filed a brief for the Westchester Racing Assn, et al., as amici curiae, opposing the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.