Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Dennis Moxley, Respondent, v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Dennis Moxley, Respondent, v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Appellant
143 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dennis Moxley, Respondent, v. New Jersey and New York Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Submitted June 19, 1894;
decided June 22, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 12, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of. plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on "trial at Circuit without a jury.
De Forest Brothers for appellant.
W. J. Groo for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Barnard, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.