Corporations
William Ruvinsky, Respondent, v. Philip Schonberg, Frances Schonberg, Jacob Grossman, Miss Bob's Coats Co., Inc., Miss Bob's Coats Corporation and Ruth Grossman, Appellants; Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent, and Others, Defendants, and Albert Stiefel, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Philip Schonberg, Intervenor-Respondent
248 A.D. 616·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Ruvinsky, Respondent, v. Philip Schonberg, Frances Schonberg, Jacob Grossman, Miss Bob’s Coats Co., Inc., Miss Bob’s Coats Corporation and Ruth Grossman, Appellants; Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent, and Others, Defendants, and Albert Stiefel, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Philip Schonberg, Intervenor-Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.