Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brooklyn and Rockaway Beach Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company et al., Respondents, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 593 · caselaw · US
General
Brooklyn and Rockaway Beach Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company et al., Respondents
178 N.Y. 593·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Brooklyn and Rockaway Beach Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Long Island Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
Brooklyn & B. B. B. B. Go. v. L. I. B. B. Go., 72 App. Div. 496, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 29, 1904;
decided April 26, 1904.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 29, 1902, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
Augustus Van- Wyck, George W. Wingate and Charles W. Church, Jr., for appellant.
Edward M. Shepard and Joseph. F. Kecmy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
App,eal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ.