General
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tiffany Lee BARNES, Respondent
99 A.3d 532·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·2014·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Tiffany Lee BARNES, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sept. 12, 2014.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 12th day of September 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the suppression court erred in concluding Respondent was subject to an unlawful search and seizure, thus granting her suppression motion and dismissing all charges based on the erroneous conclusion that the interaction between Trooper Rogowski and Respondent was an investigative detention, requiring reasonable suspicion, as opposed to a mere encounter, requiring no suspicion?