Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Von Hardenberg et al. v. Katzenbach et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 828 · caselaw · US
General
Von Hardenberg et al. v. Katzenbach et al.
385 U.S. 828·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 256.
Von Hardenberg et al. v. Katzenbach et al.
Thomas P. Sullivan for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, David L. Rose and Robert V. Zener for Katzenbach, and W. Donald McSweeney for Northern Trust Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.