Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sacher et al. v. United States, 1951 — 341 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sacher et al. v. United States
341 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 201.
Sacher et al. v. United States.
Paul L. Ross, Martin Popper, Earl B. Dickerson, Patrick H. O’Brien, Robert W. Kenny, Joseph Forer, Bernard Jajje and Thomas D. McBride for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.