Contracts · MBE-tested
Robert E. Carrick, Respondent, v. Frederica I. Westcott, Appellant, and James H. Westcott, Her Husband, Defendant, and Esther L. Carrick, Impleaded Defendant, Respondent, and Made a Party under Civil Practice Act, Section 271
249 A.D. 760·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert E. Carrick, Respondent, v. Frederica I. Westcott, Appellant, and James H. Westcott, Her Husband, Defendant, and Esther L. Carrick, Impleaded Defendant, Respondent, and Made a Party under Civil Practice Act, Section 271.
[MAJORITY]
Action to foreclose a purchase-money second mortgage on certain premises situate in the town of Mamaroneek. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and the impleaded defendant, Esther L. Carrick, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The 86th finding of fact is amended so as to provide that the memorandum signed on or about June 9, 1930, prior to the execution and delivery of the formal contract of purchase and sale, was signed by Esther L. Carrick personally as owner. It appears from the memorandum that Boehm & Co., by Emil Zvirin, signed as broker and not on behalf of defendant Esther L. Carrick. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.