Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
CHARLES ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
20 Ariz. 338179 Pac. 623·Arizona Supreme Court·1919·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Criminal No. 461.
Filed May 3, 1919.]
[179 Pac. 623.]
CHARLES ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the' county of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
Affirmed.
Mr. Albert D. Leyhe and Mr. Geo. S. Evans, for Appellant.
Mr. Wiley E. Jones, Attorney General, Mr. George W. Harben, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. L. M. Laney, County Attorney, for the State.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of “advertising and holding out to practice a system of healing the sick without license,” in the superior court of Maricopa county, and appeals. He has never lodged any brief or assignments of error in this court, nor’has he taken any other steps looking toward a furtherance of the appeal. Notwithstanding the apparent indifference of the appellant, we have carefully examined the record to see if any reversible error exists, but find pone.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.