Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hardy, Corrections Director, et al. v. Matthews, 1970 — 397 U.S. 1010 · caselaw · US
General
Hardy, Corrections Director, et al. v. Matthews
397 U.S. 1010·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 889.
Hardy, Corrections Director, et al. v. Matthews.
Charles T. Duncan, Hubert B. Pair, Richard W. Barton, and David P. Sutton for petitioners. William W. Oreenhalgh and Addison Bowman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.