Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GARDOS v. UNITED STATES of America, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
General
GARDOS v. UNITED STATES of America
75 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GARDOS v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 5338.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
March 5, 1935.
Samuel D. Berg, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.
B. J. Husting, U. S. Atty., of Milwaukee, Wis., for the United States.
Before EVANS and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
It is now here ordered by the court that the motion of counsel for appellant for an extension of time for filing brief for appellant be, and the same is hereby, denied. It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the motion of counsel for ap-pellee to dismiss this appeal be, and the same is hereby, granted, and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.