Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Amada C. De Baca et al., Administrators, etc., Appellants, v. United States et al., 1903 — 189 U.S. 505 · caselaw · US
General
Amada C. De Baca et al., Administrators, etc., Appellants, v. United States et al.
189 U.S. 505·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 402.
Amada C. De Baca et al., Administrators, etc., Appellants, v. United States et al.
Appeal from the Court of Claims.
Submitted February 24, 1903.
Decided March 2, 1903.
Mr. H. G. Burnett for appellants.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Error being confessed by the appellees, judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to proceed therein according to law.