Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Rachel A. Martin, Appellant, v. The New Rochelle Water Company et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 599 · caselaw · US
General
Rachel A. Martin, Appellant, v. The New Rochelle Water Company et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 599·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting, Cullen, J,
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rachel A. Martin, Appellant, v. The New Rochelle Water Company et al., Respondents.
Martin v. New Rochelle Water Co., 11 App. Div. 177, affirmed.
(Submitted February 7, 1900;
decided February 27, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 30, 1896, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial.
John H. Clapp for appellant.
Frederick W. Whitridge and Willard Parker Butler for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for defendants on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting, Cullen, J,