Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Freeman v. United States, 1947 — 331 U.S. 805 · caselaw · US
General
Freeman v. United States
331 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 1068 and 1069.
Freeman v. United States.
April 14, 1947.
John J. Kennett and O. C. Moore for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert S. Erdahl, Sheldon E. Bernstein, William E. Remy, David London and Jacob W. Rosenthal for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.