Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC., v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., 1958 — 356 U.S. 339 · caselaw · US
Corporations
NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC., v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
356 U.S. 339·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW YORKER MAGAZINE, INC., v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.
No. 816.
Decided April 28, 1958.
Wilbur H. Friedman, Joseph M. Proskauer and Marvin E. Frankel for appellant.
Peter Campbell Brown, Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellees.
A brief of amici curiae supporting appellant was filed by Alfred H. Wasserstrom for the Hearst Corporation, and George G. Tyler for Time, Inc.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue, 303 U. S. 250.