Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Voluntary Dissolution of The Rogers Construction Company. John E. Burke, as Receiver, Appellant; German-American Bank of Tonawanda, Respondent, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 509 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Voluntary Dissolution of The Rogers Construction Company. John E. Burke, as Receiver, Appellant; German-American Bank of Tonawanda, Respondent
175 N.Y. 509·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Voluntary Dissolution of The Rogers Construction Company. John E. Burke, as Receiver, Appellant; German-American Bank of Tonawanda, Respondent.
Matter of Rogers Construction Co.. 79 App. Div. 419, affirmed.
(Argued June 1, 1903;
decided June 16, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 21, 1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term awarding moneys in the hands of the receiver to the respondent bank.
Frank F. Williams and P. F. King for appellant.
Norman D. Fish for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.