General
Daniel Shepard, Respondent, v. The New York and Oswego Midland Railroad Company et al., Appellants
82 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel Shepard, Respondent, v. The New York and Oswego Midland Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued November 11, 1880;
decided November 19, 1880.)
W. H. Johnson for appellants.
Alex. Neish for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm without opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.