General
Ferdinand H. Pealtz, Respondent, v. William L. Thompson and Others, Copartners Composing the Firm of Otis & Company, Appellants
234 A.D. 790·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ferdinand H. Pealtz, Respondent, v. William L. Thompson and Others, Copartners Composing the Firm of Otis & Company, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent upon the ground that the admission of Exhibit 6 over objection and exception was harmful error.