Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gilstrap et al. v. Standard Oil Co. et al.; and Gilstrap v. Same, 1940 — 311 U.S. 661 · caselaw · US
General
Gilstrap et al. v. Standard Oil Co. et al.; and Gilstrap v. Same
311 U.S. 661·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 150.
Gilstrap et al. v. Standard Oil Co. et al.; and Gilstrap v. Same.
No. 151.
October 14, 1940.
A. M. Gilstrap, Cora D. Gilstrap, Vera G. White, pro se, and Mr. A. L. Wirin for petitioners. Messrs. Felix T. Smith and Francis R. Kirkham for Standard Oil Co. of Ohio, and Messrs. Oscar Lawler and Max Felix for Standard Oil Co. of California; Messrs. Homer W. Buckley and James H. Oakley for Earl Warren et al.; and Messrs. Grove J. Fink and Percy E. Towne for Hearst Publications, Inc., et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Reported below: 108 F. 2d 736.