Civil Procedure · MBE-tested

KOLLER et al. v. UNITED STATES

359 U.S. 3093 L. Ed. 2d 828·Supreme Court of the United States·1959

with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Whittaker join,

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

KOLLER et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 362. Argued March 26, 30, 1959. Decided April 20, 1959. Robert H. Malis argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Lionel Kestenbaum argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed. Rex Trailer Co. v. United States, 350 U. S. 148 (1956). [DISSENT — Mr. Justice Stewart,] Mr. Justice Stewart, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Whittaker join, dissenting. I do not agree that disposition of this case is controlled by the decision in Rex Trailer Co. v. United States, 350 U. S. 148. Believing that §26 (b)(1) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 40 U. S. C. §.489 (b)(1), imposes a civil penalty,-and that an action thereunder is therefore subject to the five-year limitation provided in 28 U. S. C. § 2462,1 would reverse. Cf. United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U. S. 537; Erie Basin Metal Products, Inc., v. United States, 150 F. Supp. 561 (Ct. Cl.). See Priebe & Sons v. United States, 332 U. S. 407.