General
In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Rosen, Respondent, against Julius Ostrofsky, Respondent, and Great American Indemnity Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent
240 A.D. 791·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1933·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Rosen, Respondent, against Julius Ostrofsky, Respondent, and Great American Indemnity Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. (See Commercial Ins. Co. v. Hallock, 27 N. J. L. 645-647; 32 C. J. 1165; Commercial Mut. Marine Ins. Co. v. Union Mut. Ins. Co., 19 How. [U. S.] 318, 322.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.