Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ewing versus M'Nair, 1796 — 2 U.S. 269 · caselaw · US
General
Ewing versus M'Nair
2 U.S. 2692 Dall. 269·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1796·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ewing versus M'Nair.
JUDGMENT was entered in this cause on the 1st day of September Term, 1796; and the plaintiff issued a Testatum Fi. Fa. to Allegheny County, founded on a Fi. Fa. to the sheriff of Philadelphia County, which was made returnable on the last day of September Term 1796, but had never been actually taken out, though it was minuted on the roll. The Testatun Fi. Fa. being levied on lands, E Tilghman now moved to set the writ aside, as being founded on a Fi. Fa, not legally or properly returnable.
[MAJORITY — by the Court:--]
But,
by the Court:--
The present case appears manifestly to be included in the words of the act of Assembly, which declares, “that the last day, as well as the first day, of every Term, shall be a common day of return in this Court, at either of which periods any writs, original, mesne, or judicial process, &c. may be made returnable; and that the writs and process returnable on the last day of the Term, shall be as valid and effectual in all cases, and to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been made returnable on the first day of the Term,” 3 State Laws p. 770. Dallas’s Edition.
% We do not mean, however, to give any opinion at this time, as to the effect of such a proceeding in charging ball, or levying upon lands, within the county, in which the judgment was rendered.
Rule refused.