Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United Insurance Co. of Chicago et al. v. Maloney, Insurance Commissioner of California, 1955 — 348 U.S. 937 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United Insurance Co. of Chicago et al. v. Maloney, Insurance Commissioner of California
348 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 523.
United Insurance Co. of Chicago et al. v. Maloney, Insurance Commissioner of California.
Jesse H. Steinhart for petitioners.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Harold B. Haas, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.