Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph W. Trunbull, Respondent, v. Eli Osborn et al., Appellants, 1874 — 57 N.Y. 680 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph W. Trunbull, Respondent, v. Eli Osborn et al., Appellants
57 N.Y. 680·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph W. Trunbull, Respondent, v. Eli Osborn et al., Appellants.
(Submitted May 8, 1874;
decided September term, 1874.)
This was an action for money lent and advanced. The only question was, whether the money was loaned to defendants or to one McBain. The referee found in favor of defendants. The General Term reversed the judgment, and granted a new trial.
Erastus Cooke for the appellants.
Crooke, Bergen & Clement for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Gray, C.,]
Gray, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.