General
Robert M. S. Putnam, Respondent, v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Company et al., Respondents, and Harry P. Pendrick, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Mary S. Putnam, Deceased, et al., Appellants
191 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert M. S. Putnam, Respondent, v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Company et al., Respondents, and Harry P. Pendrick, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Mary S. Putnam, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 9, 1908;
decided March 13, 1908.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 191 N. Y. 166.)
Motion granted and remittitur amended so as to read: “ Interlocutory judgment affirmed, judgment of the Appellate Division, so far as it modified and affirmed the final judgment, reversed and a new trial ordered pursuant to the interlocutory judgment, before the court or before another referee as the court below shall determine; costs to abide the final award of costs.”