General

Anthony Solarz, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant

155 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Anthony Solarz, Respondent, v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant. Solars v. Manhattan By. Oo., 11 Mise. Rep. 715, affirmed. (Argued February 3, 1898; decided March 1, 1898.) Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late Superior Court of the city of New York, entered January 26,1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial. Julien T. Davies and Joseph II. Adams for appellant. John J. Delcuny for respondent. [MAJORITY] Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Gray, J., absent.