ALEXANDER D. KEYES et al., Petitioners, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents

[Civ. No. 4319. First Appellate District, Division Two. July 11, 1922.] ALEXANDER D. KEYES et al., Petitioners, v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr., et al., Respondents. Municipal Corporations—Recovery op Taxes Paid Under Protest —Payment op Judgment—Levy op Tax—Constitutional Law.— Peremptory writ of mandate issued on the authority of Oscar Eeyman Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin G. Bath et al., ante, p. 499. PROCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted. The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Eeyman <& Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499. Keyes & Erskine for Petitioners. George Lull, City Attorney, and Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Respondents. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981]. A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922. All the Justices present concurred. Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting.