Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Briscoe and others v. The Commonwealth's Bank of the State of Kentucky, 1835 — 34 U.S. 85 · caselaw · US
General
George Briscoe and others v. The Commonwealth's Bank of the State of Kentucky
34 U.S. 859 Pet. 85·Supreme Court of the United States·1835
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Briscoe and others v. The Commonwealth’s Bank of the State of Kentucky.
WRIT of error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky.
Mr Ogden, for The Mayor, &c. of New York; and Mr Wilde, for George Briscoe and others,
inquired, if the court had come to a final decision as to the argument of the cases involving constitutional questions at the present term.
[MAJORITY — Mr Chief Justice Marshall.]
Mr Chief Justice Marshall.
The court cannot know whether there will be a full court during the term ; but as the court is now composed, the constitutional cases will'not be taken up.
12th February 1835.
The court was, at the .time this motion was made, and during the whole term, composed of six justices; the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Mr Justice Duvai., not having been filled.