Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hoover, Administrator, v. Pennsylvania et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
General
Hoover, Administrator, v. Pennsylvania et al.
346 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 163,
Misc.
Hoover, Administrator, v. Pennsylvania et al.
Petitioner pro se. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, James D. Hill and George B. Searls for Brownell, Attorney General, and Howard H. Yocum for Mock et al.; and Frank F. Truscott, Attorney General, and Harry F. Stambaugh for the State of Pennsylvania, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District. Certiorari denied.