General
George N. Manchester et al., Respondents, v. Susan M. Kendall et al., Executors, etc., Appellants
103 N.Y. 638·New York Court of Appeals·1886·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George N. Manchester et al., Respondents, v. Susan M. Kendall et al., Executors, etc., Appellants.
(Argued June 14, 1886;
decided October 5, 1886.)
W. McDermot for appellants.
David Thurston for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.