General
Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Company, Respondent, v. Andrew W. Mellon, Director-General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of Transportation Act of 1920 (Matter of Lehigh Valley Railroad), Appellant
216 A.D. 806·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1926·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Company, Respondent, v. Andrew W. Mellon, Director-General of Railroads, as Agent under Section 206 of Transportation Act of 1920 (Matter of Lehigh Valley Railroad), Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present •—• Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Finch and McAvoy, JJ. Finch, J., dissents on the ground that proof necessary and proper to establish mailing is lacking. (Gardam <& Son v. Batterson, 198 N. V. 175.)