General
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Canadian River Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
323 U.S. 700·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 379. No. 380.
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Canadian River Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
November 13, 1944.
Messrs. Wm. A. Dougherty, Elmer L. Brock, and E. R. Campbell for petitioner in No. 379, and Messrs. Charles H. Keffer and John P. Akolt for petitioner in No. 380.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Charles V. Shannon, Malcolm, Lindsey, Thomas H. Gibson, and Louis J. O’Marr, Attorney General of Wyoming, for the Federal Power Commission et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
In No. 379 the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is granted limited to the fifth and sixth questions presented by the petition for the writ. In No. 380 the petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is granted limited to the eighth question presented by the petition for the writ.