General
Archibald H. Tunick et al. v. Surha, Inc.
161 Conn. 601·Connecticut Supreme Court·1971·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Archibald H. Tunick et al. v. Surha, Inc.
John J. Keogh, Jr., for the appellees (plaintiffs).
Arthur A. Hiller, for the appellant (defendant Moe Tunick).
Stuart I. Levin, for the appellant (defendant David Tunick).
Argued October 5
decided October 27, 1971
[MAJORITY]
The motion of August 10, 1971, by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied without prejudice to further briefing and argument on appeal.
The motion of August 11,1971, by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fair-field County is denied without prejudice to further briefing and argument on appeal.