Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. CONSOLIDATED STONE CO., 1929 — 30 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
General
COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. CONSOLIDATED STONE CO.
30 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMERCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. v. CONSOLIDATED STONE CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
February 13, 1929.
No. 4846.
Davis, Young & Vrooman, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Moore, Barnum & Hammond, of Youngstown, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Harrington, DeEord, Huxley & Smith, of Youngstown, Ohio, for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of District Court affirmed, upon authority of opinion of Supreme Court in this matter, filed January 2, 1929, 278 U. S. 177, 49 S. Ct. 98, 73 L. Ed.-.